21 August, 2006

Argh!

Our landlord has decided to up our rent by 7.5%. Which I'm not happy about, especially as I've just started going down the line of getting a phone line installed so I can get the Internet. Greedy grasping people who can't afford their mortgage repayments. Bet you it wouldn't go down if interest rates went down again.

Anyway, probably going to stay there but you never know. In other, exciting Ben news the knee is feeling fantastic once more so hopefully I'll be able to play a lot more soccer in the next couple of weeks. Had a great game of Indoor on Friday night, forgot just how much fun it can be when everything is going right.

Other then that, nothing I'm sharing in public. Except that Ent's aren't vehicles. The tribe has spoken.

3 comments:

Andrew said...

I would have to disagree.

I read the book and saw the movie.
There were TWO hobbits being carried by an ENT.

That has to class them as a vechicle.

Futher infomation on this can be found at:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ents

My time machine calls me....

:-)

Unknown said...

Ah, but can you define a living sentient being as a vehicle? Horses are vehicles as they aren't sentient. I've always felt the definition of a vehicle requires it to be steered in a direction with a purpose by the rider for the rider. You can't do that to an Ent. Can with everything else considered a vehicle.

The tribe has spoken and no more correspondence will be entered into.

Andrew said...

The wiki definition -
"Correspondence", the communication, usually written, between two or more people.

Can you prove you are "people"?

It could be taht you ae a computer named "Ben"!

In which case Correspondance is ok.

How do you know that you cant do that with an ENT?

Where is the verifiable evidence?

I cant find one Hobbit to agree with you.

:-)